Jump to content of transcoded page.

This is a text-only page produced by the demo version of Usablenet Assistive: the actual content starts below this notice. For more details go to Lift Assistive Help Center.

jump to navigation

Homosexual Metaphor Watch: Is Gay Behavior “a destruction of God’s work” Akin to Rainforest Destruction? December 23, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

According to the International Herald Tribune today, Pope Benedict likened gay behavior to ecological destruction:

Pope Benedict said Monday that saving humanity from homosexual or transsexual behaviour was just as important as saving the rainforest from destruction.

The Church “should also protect man from the destruction of himself. A sort of ecology of man is needed,” the pontiff said in a holiday address to the Curia, the Vatican’s central administration.

“The tropical forests do deserve our protection. But man, as a creature, does not deserve any less.”

According to the article, the pope also said that:

. . . humanity needed to “listen to the language of creation” to understand the intended roles of man and woman. He compared behavior beyond traditional heterosexual relations as “a destruction of God’s work.”

The notion that homosexual behavior is, metaphorically, akin to rainforest destruction, is curious, and raises the question of how, exactly, these two things are analogous. Here are a few possibilities:

  • the human soul, like a rainforest, is a delicate ecological system, and can be harmed by bad human behavior
  • the human body, like a rainforest, should not be intruded upon in “unnatural” ways, or it will cease to function
  • the human community, like a rainforest, is subject to threats from within, which must be weeded out

Any time that humanity, as a whole, is likened metaphorically to an organic system, there is always the danger that someone or something will be identified as a “weed” or “pest” that must be purged from the system.

In this sense, the pope’s language is highly provocative—and even irresponsible and bigoted—for it puts homosexual behavior, and homosexuals generally, in the position of being something sinister—both in the community and outside the community at the same time.

Psychologically, this invites demonization of a group of people, and history offers us many tragic examples of organic metaphors that have gone bad (such as when Nazi Germany identified Jews as vermin and weeds to be driven out of the volkish community).

Another historical example includes the medieval “witch craze.” Witches, like medieval Jews, were thought of as being both in and outside of the community, and by inhabiting this “living-dead and in-out” zombie space, they were treated by the larger community with bigotry and suspicion, as well as outright persecution.

By using an organic metaphor for gay behavior (making it akin to rainforest destruction) the pope’s language invites the contemporary heterosexual community to engage, with homosexuals, in the types of social and psychological dynamics that led to the persecution of Jews and witches in Europe.

Especially troubling is the pope’s claim that the world needs an “ecology of man.” Such an “ecology” invites community cleansing, with gay people put in the position of being objectified as things that are dirty and in need of purging.

Things Can Be Different December 16, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

What Would Freud Say About This Painting? December 11, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

100_3745

An Italian court painting at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA).

In this painting, do the wand held delicately erect, the dangling belt, and the placement and gestures of the hands reveal sexual sublimation?

See Here Rachel Maddow’s Segment on “Prop. 8—The Musical” December 4, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

A Short Sass of Those Who Call Themselves Religious, and Yet Voted in California to Take Away Gay Peoples’ Marriage Rights December 4, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
5 comments

You are entitled to believe anything you wish about the Bible and gay people.

But your belief about the Bible, in a free society, cannot be normative for everyone else.

If gay people wish to disregard the Bible, and ignore its injunctions (as you understand them), that is their right.

They should be allowed to marry and to live their lives as they see fit.

In short, stop violating by force the conscience and boundaries of people with whom you disagree.

Hear That Buzzing?: SLATE Calls MILK “magic” and “a work of art” November 27, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Money quote:

[W]ith Milk (Focus Features), the story of martyred gay rights activist Harvey Milk, Gus Van Sant and screenwriter Dustin Lance Black pull off something very close to magic. They make a film that’s both historically precise (allowing for a few compressions and ellipses, Milk follows the same arc as Randy Shilts’ biography The Mayor of Castro Street) and as graceful, unpredictable, and moving as a good fiction film—that is to say, a work of art.

Sean Penn “shows what such an ordinary man can achieve”: Roger Ebert Gives “Milk” Four Stars November 26, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

Sean Penn may be headed for a “best actor” Oscar for his performance in Milk.

Roger Ebert also praises Penn’s performance, and gives the film four stars.

Money quote:

Sean Penn never tries to show Harvey Milk as a hero, and never needs to. He shows him as an ordinary man, kind, funny, flawed, shrewd, idealistic, yearning for a better world. He shows what such an ordinary man can achieve. Milk was the right person in the right place at the right time, and he rose to the occasion. So was Rosa Parks. Sometimes, at a precise moment in history, all it takes is for one person to stand up. Or sit down.

Conservatives will not like the Rosa Parks-Harvey Milk comparison that Ebert makes above, but the gay rights movement is the civil rights movement of our time, and this is a movie for our time.

Ebert gets it right.

Richard Rodriguez on H8 (Proposition 8) November 25, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Today, Salon.com posted an interview with Richard Rodriguez on gay marriage.

Money quote: 

[I]t’s one thing for the churches to insist on their right to define the sacrament of marriage for their own members. But it’s quite another for them to insist that they have a right to define the relationships of people outside their communities. That’s really what’s most troubling about Proposition 8.

Protest Proposition 8 This Saturday November 14, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Love not H8.

Here’s the organizing website for protesting California’s anti-gay equality Proposition 8 this Saturday:

http://jointheimpact.wetpaint.com/

Gw765h137

The Confederacy Finds a Place to Die—in the Republican Party? November 7, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Alan Wolfe, of the New Republic, sees America’s culture war politics as a sublimation of racial anxiety, and says of Obama’s victory:

The single most disturbing aspect of last night’s election is the transformation of the Republican Party into the party of the Confederacy.

And:

Race has long been our major division, and all our other divisions play off its script. From the culture war’s first manifestation in the guise of a Nixonian emphasis on law and order, through debates about teenage pregnancy and promiscuity, down to affirmative action, the culture war was a replay of earlier conflicts between black and white. Whether tensions were fueled by Southern politicians denouncing welfare or Al Sharpton threatening disruption, those who made race central to their outlook did not mind a little polarization here and there. This is where Obama’s coolness became essential. It took someone whose race was once a symbol of being at the bottom to lift us all over the top.

The debate will now center on how Obama should govern. On that question I would rather follow his lead than give him advice, at least for now. He has not only won an election, he has put us in touch with our history. There will be plenty of time for the criticism later. We are still reeling from an administration that played to our fears, never acknowledged its mistakes, ignored our best traditions, and shredded our moral values. We deserve a moment to feel proud once again. Barack Obama has offered it. What more could one ask for in an election?

It remains to be seen whether America can really transcend this divisive racial political narrative—sublimated or otherwise.

A good deal will depend, presumably, on whether Obama manages:

(a) to avoid assassination, and

(b) has a successful presidency.

Let’s wish him well, and his enemies ill.

I think that Wolfe’s optimistic portrayal of America’s demographic picture below is premature, but it is, nevertheless, one way to look at this election:

Fortunately for Obama, and for the rest of us, the senators and House members elected from these die-hard regions are in the minority, incapable of stopping a Democratic president from pursuing his agenda. In addition, their numbers will continue to shrink as companies move in looking for cheap labor and their kids move out looking for better opportunities. Some holdouts in the Old South may never give up, but it no longer matters. Not long ago, these kinds of people, driven by their parochial obsessions with racial superiority, ran the country. Now they will be a remnant. Perhaps they will be able to control the Republican Party for the next electoral cycle or two, but the white South has finally lost its privileged position in American political life; Jesse Helms’s Senate seat is now held by Kay Hagan. Like all those who lose their privileges, especially those who never earned them in the first place, they are unlikely to show much grace, despite the effort by John McCain, in his concession speech, to point the way. Obama would do well not to try to win them over but to ignore them. They have for too long been a malignant force in American political life, and we should not miss their passing.

We’ll see if this political obituary is premature—or whether the Republican party, over the next decade, morphs into something more benign—or even more virulent.

The Spiritual Mapping Movement and Proposition 8: 15,000 Nervy Attendees to an Anti-Gay Rally in San Diego Pray and Organize to Vote to Drive the Devil Out of California November 2, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
3 comments

Rex Wockner, a former Catholic seminarian, and now a journalist for numerous gay publications, did a fascinating photo-essay on this weekend’s YES ON PROPOSITION 8 anti-gay rights rally at Qualcom Stadium in San Diego.

He found the crowd’s enthusiasm sometimes cult-like—and generally nervy:

The crowd prayed, sang, spoke in tongues, prostrated themselves, sobbed (for California, for marriage, for the homosexuals) and, on numerous occasions, whipped themselves into a true frenzy.

Fortunately, for a stadium that might have held considerably more people, Wockner estimates the crowd to have been no more than about 15,000.

I still think that Proposition 8 will be defeated on Tuesday. The most recent poll shows the proposition failing—though only by a narrow margin.

It’s going to be close.

To see the rest of his images and commentary, click here.

Perhaps the Ickiest Ad of the Campaign Season: Fundamentalists Turn Proposition 8 into an Issue of Armageddon-Sized Proportions October 30, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
3 comments

If you live in California, vote no on 8 (if, for no other reason, to deny the hysterics who made the ad below a victory based on insighting apocalyptic fear and religious alarm against the gay community).

The video below is at once patronizing and excessive—and in its emotionalism, frankly disturbing.

It is also grotesquely smug, as if to say to gay people: ”Your free will and right to conscience simply cannot be tolerated because you are making a choice that we simply cannot abide. We might respect free will and conscience with regard to a thousand other groups—Muslims, Jews, Hare Krishnas, atheists—but we simply cannot abide gay people living life according to their own lights.”

In other words, the ad makes it seem that homosexuality, of all the sins or ways of being in the world that are mentioned in the Bible, has a special degree of evil attached to it.

The ad also demonizes the gay community as being in league with powers of “darkness.”

And it gives the impression that if California does not pass Proposition 8, then the country will somehow be under the judgment of God.

The implications are clear. Gay people will then be BLAMED for evil things that occur in this nation (as Jews were once blamed for evil things happening in Europe).

The reified emotions generated in this kind of singular focus upon a particular group is, historically, extraordinarily dangerous.

And the ad is fundamentally dishonest—for it conflates civil marriage—which is what the state recognizes (as a matter of equal treatment of all taxpayers)—with religious marriage.

Further, it is fundamentally dismissive of court protected diversity (the notion that people can have, in a free society, sharply divergent beliefs, but allow one another the space to nevertheless live their lives without interference from competing groups).

In short, gay people, however repugnant to fundamentalists, should not have to go, hat in hand, to every person in the community, and ask—beg—for their basic civil rights and equality under the law.

Not if we are to be a free society.

Anyway, here is the video:

This is The Most Moving and Powerful Defense of GAY MARRIAGE That I Have Ever Seen October 24, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
2 comments

The Republican mayor of San Diego movingly switches to the pro-gay marriage position.

Be prepared to cry watching this:

ITZHAK PERLMAN Makes a Moving Appeal to California Voters to Vote NO on PROPOSITION 8 October 24, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

One of his daughters is lesbian and married in California:

No on Proposition 8 Ad Echoes Apple Ads October 24, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
2 comments

Apple Corporation, by the way, has come out strongly opposed to Proposition 8:

What’s at Stake in This Election October 24, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

We Stand On The Crossroads Of History. Are You Engaged—or a Spectator on the Sidelines? October 23, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Barack Obama’s website link is here. Go now. Do something. 

This is our time. This is our moment.

No on Proposition 8: An Articulate Endorsement of Gay Marriage in California by the Conservative Orange County Register October 23, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Money quote:

Our preference would be for the government not to be involved in marriage, the most fundamental of institutions in a civil society. Why two people who want to be married should be required to get a license from the state is something of a mystery. Marriage existed long before the California or U.S. governments came into being and will continue long after they have been consigned to history. Whether a marriage is valid should be up to the people involved and the churches, synagogues, mosques or other religious institutions that choose to perform them or not.

As a practical matter, however, the government has so entwined itself into our daily lives that state recognition is important. Filing taxes as a married couple or as individuals makes a difference, as does the ability to own real estate, make end-of-life decisions or adopt children. Considering all this and the importance of equality before the law, the high court’s decision was justified.

It is argued that allowing same-sex marriage will infringe on the religious freedom of people who have a religiously based objection to it. It is hard to see the validity. Church and state are correctly separate in this country, and the fact that the state recognizes a union as a marriage doesn’t mean that a religious person or institution has to recognize it or approve of it. It’s hard to imagine a minister, rabbi or imam who objects to same-sex marriages being forced to perform one, and we would be the first to object if anybody tried it.

The Trees for Obama Campaign: I Made a Tree Sign for Obama, and So Can You! See Here an Image of My “Obama Tree” and How You Can Do Something Similar October 23, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

After somebody stole my homemade yard sign yesterday (see below), I decided this morning to turn one of my frontyard trees into an Obama sign (also see below). My logic was:

“They can’t steal my tree, can they?”

Likewise, you might want to use your frontyard tree as an “Obama 08″ sign.

I used some of my kids’ washable paint to do it. It was a fast and easy.

Here was my original sign. Notice that the tree behind the sign has smooth bark, which gave me the idea, after my sign was stolen, for an “Obama tree”:

100_3411

And here’s my “tree for Obama”:

100_3424

What McCain’s 3rd Debate Loss Means October 15, 2008

Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

There are just 20 days to the election, and Republican John McCain is down in the national polls by about 8 points.

Because the third debate did nothing to shake-up the dynamics of the election, this will be the story through the weekend.

In other words, losing the debate (by not winning it) means that McCain has lost another couple of days to move his numbers up with positive stories.

Losing another couple of days means that when Monday of next week comes along, there will be only 15 days to move 8 points.

In other words, McCain will have to move his polling numbers upwards by an average of 1 point every 2 days.

And even if he does this, he’ll still fall short of catching Obama.

In other words, every day lost makes this election climb for McCain ever more difficult.

And if there comes a point in which conservatives perceive that McCain is too far behind to catch up, we may find that Republican voter turn-out on election day is depressed.

No one likes to come out and back a loser.

November 4th is looking increasingly good for Barack Obama.

Text Only Options

Top of page


Text Only Options

Open the original version of this page.

     

Usablenet Assistive is a UsableNet product. Usablenet Assistive Main Page.