Homosexual Metaphor Watch: Is Gay Behavior “a destruction of God’s work” Akin to Rainforest Destruction? December 23, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: Catholicism, Christianity, gay marriage, gay rights, homosexuality, James Dobson, Jesus, pope benedict, psychology, sociology
1 comment so far
According to the International Herald Tribune today, Pope Benedict likened gay behavior to ecological destruction:
Pope Benedict said Monday that saving humanity from homosexual or transsexual behaviour was just as important as saving the rainforest from destruction.
The Church “should also protect man from the destruction of himself. A sort of ecology of man is needed,” the pontiff said in a holiday address to the Curia, the Vatican’s central administration.
“The tropical forests do deserve our protection. But man, as a creature, does not deserve any less.”
According to the article, the pope also said that:
. . . humanity needed to “listen to the language of creation” to understand the intended roles of man and woman. He compared behavior beyond traditional heterosexual relations as “a destruction of God’s work.”
The notion that homosexual behavior is, metaphorically, akin to rainforest destruction, is curious, and raises the question of how, exactly, these two things are analogous. Here are a few possibilities:
- the human soul, like a rainforest, is a delicate ecological system, and can be harmed by bad human behavior
- the human body, like a rainforest, should not be intruded upon in “unnatural” ways, or it will cease to function
- the human community, like a rainforest, is subject to threats from within, which must be weeded out
Any time that humanity, as a whole, is likened metaphorically to an organic system, there is always the danger that someone or something will be identified as a “weed” or “pest” that must be purged from the system.
In this sense, the pope’s language is highly provocative—and even irresponsible and bigoted—for it puts homosexual behavior, and homosexuals generally, in the position of being something sinister—both in the community and outside the community at the same time.
Psychologically, this invites demonization of a group of people, and history offers us many tragic examples of organic metaphors that have gone bad (such as when Nazi Germany identified Jews as vermin and weeds to be driven out of the volkish community).
Another historical example includes the medieval “witch craze.” Witches, like medieval Jews, were thought of as being both in and outside of the community, and by inhabiting this “living-dead and in-out” zombie space, they were treated by the larger community with bigotry and suspicion, as well as outright persecution.
By using an organic metaphor for gay behavior (making it akin to rainforest destruction) the pope’s language invites the contemporary heterosexual community to engage, with homosexuals, in the types of social and psychological dynamics that led to the persecution of Jews and witches in Europe.
Especially troubling is the pope’s claim that the world needs an “ecology of man.” Such an “ecology” invites community cleansing, with gay people put in the position of being objectified as things that are dirty and in need of purging.
What Would Freud Say About This Painting? December 11, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: art, Freud, gay, gay equality, gay marriage, gay rights, LACMA, lesbian, psychology, sex, Sigmund Freud
add a comment
100_3745
An Italian court painting at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA).
In this painting, do the wand held delicately erect, the dangling belt, and the placement and gestures of the hands reveal sexual sublimation?
See Here Rachel Maddow’s Segment on “Prop. 8—The Musical” December 4, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: feminism, gay marriage, gay rights, James Dobson, Jesus, lesbian, Politics, rachel maddow, religion, same-sex marriage
add a comment
A Short Sass of Those Who Call Themselves Religious, and Yet Voted in California to Take Away Gay Peoples’ Marriage Rights December 4, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: Christianity, feminism, gay marriage, gay rights, Islam, James Dobson, Jesus, John Locke, John Macarthur, Judaism, libertarianism, religion
5 comments
You are entitled to believe anything you wish about the Bible and gay people.
But your belief about the Bible, in a free society, cannot be normative for everyone else.
If gay people wish to disregard the Bible, and ignore its injunctions (as you understand them), that is their right.
They should be allowed to marry and to live their lives as they see fit.
In short, stop violating by force the conscience and boundaries of people with whom you disagree.
Hear That Buzzing?: SLATE Calls MILK “magic” and “a work of art” November 27, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: apologetics, art, civil rights, equality, feminism, film, gay marriage, gay rights, lesbian, philosophy, religion, sex
add a comment
Money quote:
[W]ith Milk (Focus Features), the story of martyred gay rights activist Harvey Milk, Gus Van Sant and screenwriter Dustin Lance Black pull off something very close to magic. They make a film that’s both historically precise (allowing for a few compressions and ellipses, Milk follows the same arc as Randy Shilts’ biography The Mayor of Castro Street) and as graceful, unpredictable, and moving as a good fiction film—that is to say, a work of art.
Sean Penn “shows what such an ordinary man can achieve”: Roger Ebert Gives “Milk” Four Stars November 26, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: film, gay, gay equality, gay marriage, gay rights, Harvey Milk, lesbian, milk, movies, Politics, rush limbaugh, same-sex marriage
1 comment so far
Sean Penn may be headed for a “best actor” Oscar for his performance in Milk.
Roger Ebert also praises Penn’s performance, and gives the film four stars.
Money quote:
Sean Penn never tries to show Harvey Milk as a hero, and never needs to. He shows him as an ordinary man, kind, funny, flawed, shrewd, idealistic, yearning for a better world. He shows what such an ordinary man can achieve. Milk was the right person in the right place at the right time, and he rose to the occasion. So was Rosa Parks. Sometimes, at a precise moment in history, all it takes is for one person to stand up. Or sit down.
Conservatives will not like the Rosa Parks-Harvey Milk comparison that Ebert makes above, but the gay rights movement is the civil rights movement of our time, and this is a movie for our time.
Ebert gets it right.
Richard Rodriguez on H8 (Proposition 8) November 25, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: Catholicism, family, feminism, gay marriage, gay rights, lesbianism, philosophy, religion, richard rodriguez, same-sex marriage, Sarah Palin, sex
add a comment
Today, Salon.com posted an interview with Richard Rodriguez on gay marriage.
Money quote:
[I]t’s one thing for the churches to insist on their right to define the sacrament of marriage for their own members. But it’s quite another for them to insist that they have a right to define the relationships of people outside their communities. That’s really what’s most troubling about Proposition 8.
Protest Proposition 8 This Saturday November 14, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: America, equality, gay equality, gay marriage, gay rights, homosexuality, lesbian, Michelle Obama, same-sex marriage, sex
add a comment
Love not H8.
Here’s the organizing website for protesting California’s anti-gay equality Proposition 8 this Saturday:
ITZHAK PERLMAN Makes a Moving Appeal to California Voters to Vote NO on PROPOSITION 8 October 24, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: California, family, feminist, gay marriage, gay rights, Itzhak perlman, lesbian, life, love, same-sex marriage, sex
add a comment
One of his daughters is lesbian and married in California:
No on Proposition 8 Ad Echoes Apple Ads October 24, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: California, discrimination, equality, gay marriage, gay rights, history, James Dobson, lesbian, no on 8, Politics, Proposition 8, psychology
2 comments
Apple Corporation, by the way, has come out strongly opposed to Proposition 8:
No on Proposition 8: An Articulate Endorsement of Gay Marriage in California by the Conservative Orange County Register October 23, 2008
Posted by santitafarella in Uncategorized.Tags: conservatism, Democrats, freedom, gay marriage, gay rights, lesbian, mormonism, Politics, Proposition 8, religion, Republicans, sex
add a comment
Our preference would be for the government not to be involved in marriage, the most fundamental of institutions in a civil society. Why two people who want to be married should be required to get a license from the state is something of a mystery. Marriage existed long before the California or U.S. governments came into being and will continue long after they have been consigned to history. Whether a marriage is valid should be up to the people involved and the churches, synagogues, mosques or other religious institutions that choose to perform them or not.
As a practical matter, however, the government has so entwined itself into our daily lives that state recognition is important. Filing taxes as a married couple or as individuals makes a difference, as does the ability to own real estate, make end-of-life decisions or adopt children. Considering all this and the importance of equality before the law, the high court’s decision was justified.
It is argued that allowing same-sex marriage will infringe on the religious freedom of people who have a religiously based objection to it. It is hard to see the validity. Church and state are correctly separate in this country, and the fact that the state recognizes a union as a marriage doesn’t mean that a religious person or institution has to recognize it or approve of it. It’s hard to imagine a minister, rabbi or imam who objects to same-sex marriages being forced to perform one, and we would be the first to object if anybody tried it.