Forensic scientists could soon be pulling fingerprints from fired bullet casings, a technique not unlike one used by Batman to track down the Joker in this year's summer blockbuster.
Despite advances in DNA technology, fingerprint identification remains an important forensic tool. In the UK, twice as many car thieves are caught by fingerprint identification as by DNA evidence.
Fingerprinting dust clings to organic compounds like amino acids and urea from skin to reveal prints. But any of those residues on a bullet are likely to be burned away when it is fired, typically reaching temperatures above 200°C.
Now John Bond, a scientist with the Northamptonshire Police and fellow at the University of Leicester, both in the UK, has discovered that fired bullet casings can reveal fingerprints. And it is the high temperatures they reach that make it possible.
Etched prints
When a gunman loads a cartridge into their gun tiny quantities of salty sweat from their fingers are transferred onto it, recording an impression of the fingerprint.
Firing the gun rapidly heats the casing, vaporising the water in the sweat. "You're left with non-volatile salts," Bond says. Established fingerprinting techniques ignore those residues, but they can reveal prints, he has discovered.
"At high temperature, those salts are molten and you get a chemical reaction with the metal." Those reactions chemically etch the fingerprint into the surface of the bullet casing when the cartridge is fired - and no amount of washing or wiping will remove it.
"Even if heat vaporises normal clues, police will be able to prove who handled a particular gun," says Bond.
Brass rubbing
However, the technique only works with certain metals, Bond explains. Reactive metals like zinc and aluminium oxidise naturally in the air, becoming coated in a layer of oxide that prevents the fingerprints from corroding the metal.
"At the other end of the spectrum, gold and platinum are so unreactive that fingerprints don't react with them at all." The best results are found with copper, a key component of brass. "Fortunately most shell cases are made from brass," says Bond.
Bond says gunmen without sweaty fingers can also be traced from heated bullet casings. "There might not be any salty sweat present, but the fatty sebaceous glands will deposit fats and waxes on the metal," he says.
Those fatty deposits also record an impression of the prints. When the metal is heated up, its surface becomes oxidised. "But the fatty deposits inhibit that oxidation, so you end up with nice shiny brass where the fingerprint was deposited, and dull brass surrounding it."
Bond's team has already processed bullets provided by the US and UK police, and the technique could also be crucial in identifying terrorist bombers. The researchers have already talked to the military about using the technique in Afghanistan. "Bombs are likely to be made from dense metals like copper," says Bond. "The science should work in the same way."
Journal reference: Journal of Forensic Sciences (DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00738.x)
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
Have your say
Not Unlike?
Fri Aug 29 13:58:39 BST 2008 by Steve
Except for being totally unlike. In the film, it's a bullet that he reconstructs in order to recover a fingerprint, not a case.
Even the guy who's developed the idea needs to be more careful with his use of words
""Even if heat vaporises normal clues, police will be able to prove who handled a particular gun," says Bond."
Guns don't get hot, finding fingerprints on them is pretty straight forward, the article is dealing specifically with finding out who handled a particular case. That doesn't mean they handled the gun, nor that they fired the bullet.
Not Unlike?
Fri Aug 29 15:15:57 BST 2008 by Nick
Yeah, it won't be conclusive, but if you lift a fingerprint from a casing that you can prove was fired from a murder weapon, it can at least point you in the right direction - even if it's just the fingerprint of the owner of the gun store where the killer bought the ammunition.
If you can match a fingerprint on the gun to a fingerprint on one a casing fired by the gun, it's likely (but granted, not definitive) that the fingerprint belongs to someone who at least loaded the weapon.
Spoiler
Fri Aug 29 15:07:55 BST 2008 by Ben
Thanks for giving away part of the movie, I'm the one person in the UK that's not seen it yet
Spoiler
Fri Aug 29 15:56:09 BST 2008 by Lee Devlin
Oh and when you think the joker is dead, he's not and comes back to kill off the love interest and create two face.
Spoiler
Fri Aug 29 16:34:41 BST 2008 by 'nuther Ben
That's just mean. :p
How Many Car Thieves Do You Catch
Fri Aug 29 15:19:04 BST 2008 by Emre
"In the UK, for every car thief trapped by DNA evidence, two are caught by fingerprint identification."
So you're saying two out of every car thief caught?
Who wrote this article? This makes no sense.
How Many Car Thieves Do You Catch
Fri Aug 29 15:45:53 BST 2008 by Colin Barras
Hi Emre,
The police catch a number of car thieves using DNA data. But they capture twice as many car thieves using traditional fingerprint evidence. That means that for every thief they capture using DNA data, they capture two through fingerprint identification. The text is correct as it stands, but we've changed it to a form that should avoid any confusion.
Colin Barras, online technology reporter
How Many Car Thieves Do You Catch
Fri Aug 29 16:00:21 BST 2008 by Lee Devlin
No, if you read it properly, it is pretty clear in saying that for every thief caught using DNA, there are a further two caught via fingerprint evidence. So if i put it very very simply (as i think i may need to), if three were caught, one would be via dna, the other two through finger print evidence.
How Many Car Thieves Do You Catch
Sun Aug 31 06:40:08 BST 2008 by Alex
That would be correct if you simply ignore the ones that are caught by other means (e.g. While driving the stolen vehicle).
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.